Wright, D. J., Goodchild, M. F., & Proctor, J. D. (1997). Demystifying the Persistent Ambiguity of GIS as ‘Tool’ versus ‘Science’. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87(2), 346-362. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.872057
"Perhaps I am naive, but I am optimistic that -- despite history -- maps can be constructed on the basis of mutual courtesy and respect." (p 5)
"Like many, they [Inuit informants for colonial map making processes] were unwitting conspirators to their own disenfranchisement." (p 9) But now "... they made a conscious and concerted decision to engage with the enfranchised culture on its own terms, turning its technology and politicas to their own purposes." (p 10)?
"The model for dealing with this complexity over the last century has been what Scott (1998) refers to as "Authoritarian High Modernism," that is, making the landscape and the people legible to outsiders. This has huge dangers, as to be legible is to be more easily controllable. Not to be legible is to be invisible. Mapping is a two edged sword." (p 30)